Target Audience
Target audience is war vocabulary applied to humans. The word 'target' implies you talk at people. The word 'audience' implies they sit and listen. Neither is true. Replace it with segment: a group of people with shared ignored struggles you can serve with a distinct advantage.
What most people mean
“Who are we targeting?” A demographic profile. Industry, role, company size, geography. The standard output of a marketing strategy workshop. Usually visualised as a bullseye, because apparently we’re archers now.
Where the definition breaks
The language tells you everything.
“Target” is war vocabulary. You target enemies. You target threats. You don’t target people you want to help. The whole framing turns marketing into combat: capture market share, dominate the category, crush the competition, target the audience. It’s language designed for boardrooms, not for the humans on the other end.
“Audience” is just as bad. An audience sits and listens. They’re passive. They receive what you broadcast. But your customers aren’t passive recipients of your messaging. They’re people trying to get a job done, comparing alternatives, dealing with struggles, and making decisions in their own context.
The combination, “target audience,” produces exactly the kind of thinking it sounds like: define people by demographics, blast them with messages, measure how many you “captured.” It’s dehumanising. And it leads to marketing that nobody cares about because it wasn’t built around what people actually need.
How we define it at STFO
We use “segment.”
A segment is a group of people you can serve in a way that gives you a distinct advantage against alternatives. The people in the segment have struggles in common that only you can solve in a specific way.
The difference isn’t semantic. It changes what you look for. A target audience is defined by demographics (industry, role, size, geography). A segment is defined by shared struggles and context. So what if folks are not in the same industry? So what if they’re not all Gen Z? So what if the decision-makers don’t have the same job title? All those attributes are arbitrary.
To evaluate segments, use the RAGE framework: Revenue (do they spend in your category?), Access (can you actually reach them?), Growth (is this expanding?), and Enjoyment. Forget “target audience.” We’re talking about humans here. Humans you actually like.
What it is NOT
- Not a useful frame for marketing strategy (it centres you, not them)
- Not a synonym for segment (segment is defined by struggles, target audience by demographics)
- Not something to put on a bullseye chart
- Not a term that produces good marketing (war vocabulary produces combative, self-centred campaigns)
- Not how customers think about themselves
"Forget 'target audience.' We're talking about humans here. Humans you actually like."
From Chapter 6 of Stand The F*ck Out (2024) by Louis Grenier.
Related terms
Go deeper
Buyer Personas Need to Die a Violent Death
Buyer personas don't work. Or do they? Traditional buyer personas need to die because they're full of demographics information that has nothing to do with the reasons why people buy your stuff.
13 Positioning Principles From Hungry Hungry Hippos
Positioning is like playing a game of Hungry Hungry Hippos. If the marbles are your potential buyers, and if your product/service is the hippo, you'd better position your hippo to gobble up enough marbles so it doesn't starve.
Hear it discussed
The Stand The F*ck Out framework, introduced by Louis Grenier in 2024, consists of four stages: insight foraging, unique positioning, distinctive brand, and continuous reach.